Call For Abstracts:
The  development of heritage as a distinctive, international field of  governance regulated through institutions like UNESCO, ICOMOS, ICCROM  and the IUCN is closely linked to practices of decolonisation and  fieldwork. Taking cultural heritage alone, anthropologists,  archaeologists, architects and engineers worked across the decolonising  world in countries like Egypt, Indonesia and Pakistan making the  development of this new form of governance a reality; so too did experts  from area studies, government survey agencies and philanthropic  organisations. This work helped to (re-)constitute the fields that these  practitioners were connected to, creating new disciplinary assemblages,  new forms of knowledge, and rearranging the relationship of  fieldworkers to the places where they laboured. At the same time, this  process was not simply a product of decolonisation; in fact, it had its  origins in knowledge practices which were often closely connected to  practices of colonial governance and the complex administrative  relationship between colonies and metropoles. These older, colonial  practices were simultaneously reconstituted and entangled within these  newly emergent disciplinary assemblages and knowledge practices as  decolonisation gathered pace.
Yet despite increased interest in  the histories and practice of cultural and natural heritage, there is  little understanding of how their interconnection with decolonisation  and the field actually took place. How did these three things work  together to make heritage governance a reality? How did decolonisation  shape the form of that governance and the sorts of fieldwork that took  place? How, vice versa, did these forms of fieldwork and governance  shape decolonisation, and how also did colonial practices play a role?  Moreover, how (if at all) do the answers to such questions vary across  time and space? If we are to understand the relationship between  heritage, decolonisation and the field—and, by extension, the  development of heritage governance itself—providing answers to these  questions is a necessity, as is considering the methodologies which we  might use to make these answers effective.
This conference invites  papers which address these questions from a range of disciplinary  perspectives, and which in particular use international, comparative, or  global case studies to do so. We are interested in papers that take the  field of ‘heritage’ as one which is intentionally broad and contingent,  encompassing both ‘natural’ and ‘cultural’ heritage and the diverse  range of institutions by which it is governed (museums, herbaria, zoos,  regional, national and international historic preservation agencies  etc). The organisers (William Carruthers, Andreas Gestrich and Indra  Sengupta, German Historical Institute London; Rodney Harrison, AHRC  Heritage Priority Area Leadership Fellow, UCL Institute of Archaeology)  welcome abstracts of no more than 400 words, which should be submitted  to carruthers@ghil.ac.uk by 31st May 2017. 
Financial  support will be prioritised for those participants without their own  travel funds and early career researchers.
Contact Email: carruthers@ghil.ac.uk
