Call For Papers:
“What  convinces masses are not facts, and not even invented facts, but only  the consistency of the system of which they are presumably part.” –
Hannah Arendt, Origins of Totalitarianism
In his treatise Rhetoric,  Aristotle details three principal means by which an orator can attempt  to persuade an audience: by appealing to credibility and authority  (ethos), by engaging the emotions of the audience (pathos), and by  deploying logic and fact (logos). While Aristotle believes that  presenting a strong body of proof is the most effective way of  persuading people given what he argues to be humanity’s natural  inclination towards Truth (Rhetoric I.1,  1355a15f.), he also concedes that those who have a masterful command of  rhetoric can use their skills to arouse incendiary emotions, distract  attention away from the subject, and override the rationality of any  given audience. In drawing attention to the problematic manipulability  of truth perceptions, Aristotle invites us to consider the  epistemological affinity between belief and experience, as well as the  ethical implications of all forms of communication.
 
 
 
Coinciding  with such diverse phenomena as the rise of digital culture, the upsurge  of political populism, and the hyper-technologization of modern life,  competing narratives of factuality and truth have gained frontline  visibility in our day-to-day reality. The discussions surrounding truths  and facts have even inspired the Oxford English Dictionary to  declare “post-truth”—an adjective defined as “relating to or denoting  circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping  public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief”—as 2016’s  Word of the Year. This parallels, in a supremely ironic way, the  fabricated epigraph that Jean Baudrillard uses to open Simulacra and Simulation,  the insight of which resonates even stronger now in our day with the  accelerating digital age: “The simulacrum is never what hides the  truth—it is truth that hides the fact that there is none. The simulacrum  is true.” In the age of artificial intelligence, social media, and  reality television, the notions of simulacra and creation of narratives  impact ever more strata of our lives and bring to the fore questions  such as: What kind of “new reality” exists in the era of post-truth, and  how is that translated in cultural production? Is postmodernity, given  its constant interrogation of realities and truths, the most productive  way of helping us make sense of shifting epistemes? What  responsibilities and challenges arise with the novel ways that  knowledge—and perhaps by extension, truth—is produced and communicated?  Are we, indeed, in an era of “post-truth”? Are we done with facts?
Furthermore,  in the realm of narratives and material production, questions around  literariness and fiction arise: if fiction is inevitably infused with a  certain degree of reality, then is fiction, in turn, able to modify the  Real? How are facts integrated into fiction and what happens when  fiction interpenetrates with facts? In what ways can we speak about  literariness as a post-factual regime? What have been some of the  literary strategies deployed towards fictionalizing facts, truth, or  epistemes? On the flipside, in what ways has fiction been historicized  as fact, truth, or “real”? How have these polyvalent strategies evolved,  if at all, over time?
This  conference invites papers on literary, historical, and theoretical  investigations of narratives, hermeneutics, and myths of facts and  truths. Topics of discussion may include but are not exclusive to:
1) Myths and narratives: literary/historical/theoretical  intersections of mythification; postmodernism and truths; hyperreality;  simulacra-as-truth; rhetorics; “Post-truth”; hermeneutics of suspicion;  populism and propaganda; emotion vs. logic; demagoguery and xenophobia;  opportunistic narratives; the trans/de-valuation of facts-as-truths and  truths-as-facts; truth-value; philosophy of language; trans-human,  post-human, alternate ecologies
2) Wikileaks and whistleblowing in the digital age: digital humanities; ethics in the digital world; truth in the digital age; piracy and hacking; AI; AI and paranoia narratives
3) Critique of institutions: (post-)faculties;  ideology, institutions and institutionalization; writings on art  history and literary history; approaches to history writing; museums and  art history; capitalism; avant-garde theory; culture industry and the  Frankfurt School.
4) Material culture in the post-truth era: virtual  objects; mythical and/or “real” and/or virtual artifacts; material  culture and virtuality; artifacts and their faculties; art forgery;  facts and things; representation of objects, objects as representation;  surrealism and its legacies.
Related fields of interest may include but are not limited to: Comparative  Literature and Literary Theory; Critical Theory; English, French; and  Spanish Studies; Studio arts; Sociology; Anthropology; Political  Science; Queer Theory and Gender studies; Interdisciplinary Studies;  Digital Humanities; Cultural Studies; Linguistics; History; Philosophy;  Film and Media studies; etc.
We are asking those interested in delivering 15 to 20-minute presentations to submit abstracts of no more than 300 words to themattersoffact@gmail.com by January 3, 2018.  Please include your name, abstract keywords, institutional affiliation,  technical requirements, and a 50-word bio in your email. Abstracts and  presentations in English, Spanish, and French are welcome.
Abstract submission deadline: January 3, 2018
Expanded versions of conference presentations will be considered for publication in The Scattered Pelican, the peer-reviewed graduate journal of Comparative Literature at Western University. 
Contact Info: 
Busra Copuroglu
bcopurog@uwo.ca
Ph.D. student in Comparative Literature
Western University
Department of Modern Languages and Literatures
Arts and Humanities Building Room 3R02
London, Ontario